2025-07-07T08:35 AM
(This post was last modified: 2025-07-07T08:45 AM by Claude Millot.)
Hi Sylvain,
Many sincere thanks for all what you are doing for me.
I am sorry to be unaware of all the difficulties you encounter to get the adequate files.
I hope what we are doing will be expressive, giving a realistic geodesic structure (from the the mean) and a realistic oceanic structure (from the corrected Dec 30 swath) ... and conclusive, allowing to hypothesize a kind of oceanic phenomenon.
Because I am a lucky guy (as demonstrated by the fact I met a so kind, open minded and efficient "software engineer"), I am very confident.
Best regards,
Claude
Sylvain,
Discussion with a person like you allows me clarifying my ideas.
In what I proposed, it is expected that all small scale geoid features are measured during all swaths (computing a mean makes sense) and that a major oceanic event was measured only on Dec. 30., so that oceanic signals are relatively low only during the other swaths.
I thus think that it can be easily justified to compute the mean from all available swaths... except the one on Dec. 30. (the mean-geodesic signal will thus be modified as less as possible by the oceanic signals).
Cheers,
Claude
Many sincere thanks for all what you are doing for me.
I am sorry to be unaware of all the difficulties you encounter to get the adequate files.
I hope what we are doing will be expressive, giving a realistic geodesic structure (from the the mean) and a realistic oceanic structure (from the corrected Dec 30 swath) ... and conclusive, allowing to hypothesize a kind of oceanic phenomenon.
Because I am a lucky guy (as demonstrated by the fact I met a so kind, open minded and efficient "software engineer"), I am very confident.
Best regards,
Claude
Sylvain,
Discussion with a person like you allows me clarifying my ideas.
In what I proposed, it is expected that all small scale geoid features are measured during all swaths (computing a mean makes sense) and that a major oceanic event was measured only on Dec. 30., so that oceanic signals are relatively low only during the other swaths.
I thus think that it can be easily justified to compute the mean from all available swaths... except the one on Dec. 30. (the mean-geodesic signal will thus be modified as less as possible by the oceanic signals).
Cheers,
Claude